The Medical and surgical reporter (1893) (14780965294)

Identifier: medicalsurgical691893phil (find matches)
Title: The Medical and surgical reporter
Year: 1858 (1850s)
Authors:
Subjects: Medicine Surgery
Publisher: (Philadelphia, Pa. : Crissy & Markley, Printers)
Contributing Library: Smithsonian Libraries
Digitizing Sponsor: Smithsonian Libraries



Text Appearing Before Image:
he entire champagne importations andover 9,000 cases more than of any other brand. It is noted for its excellence, purity and naturaldryness. G. H. Mumm & Co.s Extra Dry of the excellent 1889 vintage is attracting great attention forits natural dryness, purity and quality. FREDK de BARY & CO , New York, Sole Agents in the United States and Canada, FluidExtract Specify Xildens ERGOT Formulaof 1874 The superiority of this preparation over all others consists in the factthat our Ergot is manufactured iby a process unknown to any othermaker, whereby certain undesirable qualities are eliminated, and because 1. It is positively niiiform in strength and action. 2. It does not nauseate. 3. It can be used hypodermically without causing inflammationof cellular tissue or abscess. 4. The dose required is smaller. HYPODERMIC DOSE : Five to fifteen drops dikited with water.Samples furnished upon application. EstablishedS848 Prepared only by THE TILDEN CO, New Lebanon, N. Y. IncorporatedS893
Text Appearing After Image:
(fONGA.30GRS SODIUM SALICYLATE IQGRS COLCHICIN SALICYLATE l/SOOGf^.EXXIMICIFUGAERACLMOSAE. %G-1R%. PILOCARPIN SALICYLATE. l/(0OGrf^^ •sri^o^/S THE Medical and SurgicalReporter. No. 1911. PHILADELPHIA, OCTOBER 14, 1893. Vol. LXIX—No. 16 ORIGINAL ARTICLES BLOOD-LETTING AS A THEEAPEUTIO AGENT IN THE TREATMENT OF DISEASES.* J. S. DUKATE, M. D. ^^ Stat magni nominis umhra. Itstands the shadow of a mighty name.There is a great diversity of opinion, anda tendency to reaction in regard to theutility of blood-letting. Some holding itto be unique, single in kind or excellence.To the old physician it is a souvenir ofthe past. For nearly half a century I have been aclose observer of its effects clinically, andI have always considered it, when ju-diciously employed, a semper fidelis—al-ways faithful in its results, and it shouldbe in the hands of every physician a semperparatus—always ready. But for years ithas only been known as • the lost art.Why? Because times have changed andwe must